S.Jayadev vs The Southern Railway on 19 March, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7234 of 2010(D)


1. S.JAYADEV, SON OF K.SUNDARESAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL

3. THE STATION MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.EASWARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :19/03/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               ----------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No.7234 OF 2010
             -----------------------------------------------------
           DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF MARCH, 2010

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner was appointed on 7.12.2007 to manage the

work of handling parcel in Alwaye Railway Station. It is averred

in the Writ Petition that pursuant to the same, the 3rd respondent

issued identity cards to the petitioner as well as 10 members of

staff under him. Exhibits P1(a) to (g) are the copies of the

identity cards.

2. The matter was going on smoothly and when one

Station Manager Shri Rahim was appointed, he restrained the

petitioner from entering into the Station and accordingly there

arose some dispute in respect of that matter. The main prayer in

the Writ Petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to grant

the petitioner payment of the work of handling parcel in Alwaye

Railway Station with effect from 7.12.2007 at the rate of Rs.10

per ton. The further prayer is to direct the respondents to furnish

the petitioner his work experience certificate as expeditiously as

possible.

W.P.(C)No.7234/10 -2-

3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the

respondents. It is submitted that the 2nd respondent will

consider Exhibit P4 after verifying the records maintained in the

Office concerned and then take steps in the matter. The learned

counsel for the petitioner submits that Exhibit P3 may also be

directed to be considered by the 2nd respondent while considering

Exhibit P4 representation. Exhibit P3 is a reply given by the

Additional Divisional Railway and Appellate Authority. Therefore

the same also will be considered by the 2nd respondent. The

petitioner can also appear before the 2nd respondent and place all

the details available to him in that regard. Appropriate action will

be finalised within a period of two months.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE

dsn