WWW €
i
E
2
§
gas
§
%
g
3
§
Q
E
§
3
»u”o:.0 wm W
M<"'m:'MWea &5'i5ii"?rW'5¥J-5 WW
IR was amen counm cs xnnnnraxn, nanaamoaafa
namzn runs was 17" any 02 JULY 2o¢% ; i ; .
BEFORE
was HflN'BL£ xx. avswrcx Huzvvzfix G a§3xaH "};7
warm PETITION HD.16?99!2¢G§fL~KSRf¢f":
BE'l'W£I€1'¥:
5 LAKSHNANB
AGED ABOT 51 23535.-k
i/0 K.SIBnAPRA
R/O soyanpvn amen
HDRAPET ;”‘§,* g
CHITRADUREa~* :,:~
u _h : ;§§ é§rIrxawmn
{By s:1M:_s.$’gggggsafiégagmzfiv I
nan : I %u %fl .’
THE nIvIsxd3LcdT§hnfi&%
Ksamc, RA§fiNGER£’DIVI$IdN
navauengg = =M< V … RRSPGDENT
Affiy Sr: ; fl*$°3A§ESfl,.AB? 3
2318 $? £tixn Human anmxcnzs 226 Ann 227
.jgQ: tan casrzwvrzas or IRDIA pnaxzns TD qmasa
_ _ «¢H$»:urugnén eanzn nT.17~1e–2oo2 aasssn IN xxn
*.31=]¢fu§§iv£i2¢oo Ha Hb.ID.88f2003 vans ANN.G Ann
wmvww
Tifis 'WP. CO!§I¥$ mi' 303. HEARING
'1'!-E CGEIRT HRDE TIE ¥O :
Day, This petition in J the award dated
Industrial sfixila. éimissing
the dispute %%]”i:c%}kj%A176/zooo rm
Ha.ID.88( also sought
for and further
sought. t ‘~:£%£>£’*§:_: =6. ta rasinatata the
bank times and fax:
such Estgievz ‘
2. *.,v.,4V’thé:'”~-.1eunnd counsel fax the
an “¢mWu0″‘W5i’\6$’- WE mmmmmwmm mssww mmwwwa wua” wmwwwaéflfifi Wfiérii-W mmmflw W? %%fl?*£fl%”¥”&%& Mgfiw mam Q? mawflmm Mmw QQMEW W?
Lij%}%%;¢spe¢cm gamma.
i[‘jTi;é”*–3;atitiono:: jcinad. the saxvizze at the
“.}:q_hféod:ient-Corporation as a Condu¢to::. While
Vfiras confiucrting titan vahiale bearing
33/
the Laban: Court at Hnhxi. The Laboafigcauzt
by its order detasd ‘F10–2002 on 4:16
fairness at the enquiry,
the merits of the can
the manner in which flag
conducted, paased a ¢£fi§t1a drag: h$;éing tag:
the Isnquixy hel§.”/%,ia Further
it is natiged was not givon
an itoih the repartinq
V§V§ri;’&’onca in ascacardanaa
“Mmw”: mvwfli WI?” mmmwéwmmfl i”Hi:W QUWNE U? K%@€N%”§fiK% WWJVW QQUUWY WW Wa.§%lNfi¢.’fi”Mm %§§G%'”§ WWW fig Wgfifi CWURV Q?
4. What» b:a§§;t1′ v’qu.eai§;Lc>n¢d by the leamad
¢§#fi$QiW”gé$ Vgna §§£it1oner is that the
which was held fair and
Iiraboux ccsuzt shcrald have been
prcpex: finding given an the said
Elnuteaad. u cryptie an-rdez: has bun
‘ T ‘fi§§$aa% holding that tha workman has net
than opportunity of cross-examination.
W .
But that itsolt will not speak to fact
that the enquiry held in fair and
Labour Ccsurt ought to
maturial placed bofoza ‘1
the enquiry hold is};
mrits, in so far mtticzkcfis
aftaz: ccsllection of “no:
tickets are ccncegnod, Laban:
Ccsurt has come; that the changes '
5. Ethan of tieksta by
the wm:k11f.an_ ;§§’1: ‘t:lz; e Quhmisaion made; very
siif;§§’n;g9i3¥ I,aho_ 11$ “” Court has ebaax-wad that
it ‘a1}au;V=xV«£€;$tv Ti:2;§vV.£-.i«:nt party wcsrman to explain
Aw£zatV.__v”c:L15:£:uu:stanc::as, the said tickets
‘”‘§}§’1:s§:”‘.:;:¢#i$s:u;§:d. on the paint of preliminary
‘ ‘ fLisfizfifi’-.V_it3.$1f; the concluaicn arrived at by the
‘L%a’.)._’:e:z.mT§ court is am: basgd an the material
placed rather ngntioning in the arder
Ear-9;’
» “-0WI*”W”‘V2t9P.K’&W writ
wwmmavmwmwwm mmwm m…im««.a;_jma MW” wmmwmmmm WEWW mama! Q?’ KAfiNATAK.& WSGH COQR? 0? %&%WA7’A§CA. Hifiéfi @0133? fl}? %&flNAW’5%%A W§GH fl
U
3
E
3
é
§i
E
E
fie
Q
5%
&
3
Q
Q
3
§
x
8%
Q
E
swim &..u’we¢;a wr” mmmwmfimflfl Wfilwfi hifitlfifi {W WfiRNA’§’fiKfl filfifl HOUR”? 05″ KARNATAKW H§GW fimm? Q?’
sheet that on perusal of the roc:::’§f:»,. the
enquiry shown ta be held fair
that itself would not be s1:1£::,Lc’,¥.’_:3″;Vsz’::A:.A:*T.::’
that the enquiry hold
6. In the circuma£’¥.’;,§:a§, is
allowed and :5; max on the
Preliminary on merits in
x:ejecti;n§ :’t.:ii’§:! aside and the
matter: ‘A Vtha Labauz: Cam’: ta
A’ nccoxdanca with law
épportunity ta hath
pfilfi-.i¢B ‘¥ I} ”
Sd/-.
fudge
” ‘§g;1:;’V”-*