IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALoRE:""»T.
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OC1'OBER 2093.' "
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. RD. BINAKARA.;!§I';A'VC3:FiIi?',F'.
ANI) . %
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1CE:v..G. $AB}_+:IAH_"iT "~
WRIT PETYTION Nc);4.1.i:57s:/mggmus*«£(:rh§:M1NEs}
BETWEEN:
S. Mohammad Ta13.\}€;éz. H _
S/0 S. Ahmed-1~Iussajn," -» '
Aged 34 years," V' " % V'
Smart Communiéations,' , .
Hotel Rameshwazi Camplax, "
Kalamma .S1reei;, & V _
Bf:11ai(y--583 .101, A. H """ " PETKFIONER
(By Adv.)
Fm; Union éfindia
.._!"x'&:}i). by its Secietary,
_1\r!inis1:iy'Of Mines,
V" 1§')e]11i--1lO 001.
V. Niloufer Akbar, Government Advocate for R-2,3 as 5)
2. The State of Kamataka
by its Secretary,
Dcpaxtment of Commcrce
and Industries,
M.S. Building,
Dr. Ambcdkar Vechi, V b
Bangalore-560 O01.
3. The Director of Mines
and Geology,
Government of Karnataka,
Khanija Bhavaa,
Race Course Road,
Bangalore-560 O0 1.
4. Union ofindia, '
Rep. by its '
Ministry of Enviifonmcnt * A
and Forest, '
C.G.O. Co;é11p1cX;*'
Lodhmoaci, - ' . "
New De1hi--1-3.0 001; _ *
5. The Chief Consérvatoréf
Forests, Kcndriya V
A .....
17th Main Raad,
H
Banga1¢m--56'C.,,o34;V"'
6. M] s Mineral
~.
"' ¢A~--p'au'111ership firm with
._It&y"1~2gis'i£€red oficc at
Nch211'CaVlony, Bel1ary--583 101.
f __Rép. by its Partner,
T Nagana Gowda. 'RESPONDENTS
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227’nof»thc
Constitution of India praying to direct Respondents 4 _”{-5′ ‘to
consider and take appropriate action on the representatiotnaot’ the
petitioner at A1mexure–K dated 2.7.2007′.
This Writ petition coming up for
the Court delivered the following.
J U D G M§.;__N T
(Delivered by RB. Co.) H’ V}
Even though the eouasei’*Vfor.::’t3t§§e»t_oC?itio11er submits
that the 6″‘ respondent: out of the
limits of the by the Competent
Authority ane{‘–:h{e. to by the petitioner by
its letter (fated men s fietifioner has failed to funaish the
‘t.o~the following:
(i)_ granting Mining Lease in favour of
A the.t3*’%’i4j’:;etspondent;
‘i’}iesextent of land to which mining lease was
” — with suxvey number, taiuk and district;
Vt ” Whether the said lease is still in force; and
V f r _ 1Tnc¥_¢x:” “s}é’s/ No”
(iv) To What extent, the 6th respondent exceeded then”-.,_
limit prescribed under the lease. T
(2) Without the above paI1:icula1s,’ it is
the above writ petition. However consigie’rjx’1g.th:e V:of7%:he’g
public, sufice it to permit the pctitionereto ._
detajis and give a fresh xepresentatiefirtoé ‘V V
inviting as to the violation committed; by :’t1ji1eE31F* xesgiondeengtc, who is
operating the iron ore mine the’ considered by
the Competent Authority on xxgeiifs o.ftt”v=-7 due notice
to the 6″‘ Ies;f;:0ndeiiAtj;3is()x.VVA:’«_
(3) The -writ i$e’ti:fifi011.’is «.%I5.s§§sed of aecggdingly.
sd/–
Chiei iurstice
Sd/-§__
Judge
/’ ”
5,