S R Jayashankar S/O S Raja Gopal vs Bangalore Mahanagara Palike on 1 September, 2008

34 THE HIGH comer 09 KARNATAKA, Q

mmn THIS THE 181' DAY 01%'   * '   

THE Howam MR. .ms'11c%s:%  J  L  

WRIT Pr.-Irrriou No.  cjxvw    k

1 s R JAYASHANKAR 3/0 S" 
42 YEARS, _NQ.24,"GA.\if!$*H"'!G2L'P{A"»v
KAVI KA11D§§.$A Rom; 
BANGAI£;}RE._.5_6O      %

2 GIRIJA--JAYASHi3:1€I(AR~.__' *  
w/0 :&R.JA¥4     
40YEARS, A =
No.24,  

KAVI   
  %  %%%%%  ... Pmmoxma

  T   RAIEAS & ANAND, ADV. )

   .1 A   mmmnaaam PALIKE

%%   rrs oommmronrm

   Q mnmmmn BUILDING
" «   KARASIMHARAJA swam
  zamaanoam, fismm BY

 ma ASHOK HARANAHALLI, ADV. )

'THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 2% AND 227 OF
THE OONSTPFUPION, PRAYING T0 DHEEKH' THE



2
RESPONDENT AU'l'I-IORITIES ITS OFFICERS_ AND

EMPLOYEES NCYI’ TO TAKE ANY ACTION TO DEHOLISH

sac 321 0? THE MUNICIPAL 0ORPORA310N.._fi£CJi ” ,

DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS,~~P!’s sE:RvAr«z?rs 2
EMPLOYEES NOT TO mssmss
WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION 01-‘
THE SCTIEDULE kzncxéumuo
CONSERVANCY LANE Anwrmc 1′!’ ma
smn, WI’I’HHOU’1′ ‘I’AKING 1:: Acxtounmatcn mm

ms pmmon came mmmmmv
HEARING m B’ GROUP um, mm THE
FOLLOWING: %

%
‘I’11cA’%\ H _ they) we the owners of a
m pm No. 24, Kamasa Road,

3. ….. .. . um Md was

‘Keshaua Nivm’. In the said property

building known m Kcshava Nivaaa’.

um commas: in 1930 by the am
_ « grand mm. The nmmem poltkm of the
was vmnt land. sum K to my than them was a
‘ paruaonoa’:nemim1mownas<3axmhKnmwmchwa.s

constructedintheyear1971. 'I'hecascofthcpctitiona'is

sanctioned plan. The subject mattar of this
northerll portion of tho muses A1:
It appears that the building is
are the owners of the

rear side. Sufice the
nemondcnfs omchls certain
structure between K.G.

 

M and W               
pal."    a R

 

   m soumt to be mum.

I’ DE’: 1 it. it’ 2|” …..

submits that the entire amen of the

” mt hm d ocrtm strtx:tu1’e is without

to m. He f1u’thm’ sumim um tme is a

lane wmdgx is 15′ in width which runs ac:-as

J’

{‘

KG. Road and W.H.Hm1 Road, to whida meg

pemoners do not have my claim of kw
submits that without fidmng the

property, tm nespandent could

thcbuikling.

3. Learned submits

4. is wlmhw the autmritics

have %ar.-had the conmrvancy um

ofthcpmpertyofthc

K mat the peadoncrs do not chm title to the

X’