S.Stephen vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 5 February, 2010

0
52
Madras High Court
S.Stephen vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 5 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
						
DATED: 05.02.2010

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR

W.P.No.34013 of 2006
(O.A.No.9871 of 1998)

S.Stephen                                                                           ... Petitioner
Vs

1.The State of Tamilnadu 
   rep. By the Secretary to Govt.,
   Technical Education Department,
   Secretariat,
   Chennai-9.

2.The Director of Technical Education,
   Guindy,
   Chennai-25.                                                                     ... Respondents
 Prayer:
	Writ petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.9871 of 1998 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proceedings Memo No.16390/D5/97 dated 16.12.97 and quash the same and direct the respondents to appoint the applicant to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of eligibility on the basis of seniority with all monetary and service benefits and with regular periodical increments and other benefits by issuing a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate Writ. 
	For Petitioner	: Mr.R.Singaravelan  
	For Respondents	: Mr.B.Vijay, G.A. 

ORDER

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proceedings Memo No.16390/D5/97 dated 16.12.97 and quash the same and direct the respondents to appoint the applicant to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of eligibility on the basis of seniority with all monetary and service benefits and with regular periodical increments and other benefits.

2. The original application has been filed in the year 1998 seeking the relief of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. Even in the impugned order, it has been stated that as and when the petitioner reaches the seniority, his claim will be considered. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to state as to whether the relief sought for has already been granted. In such view of the matter, if the grievance of the petitioner has not been considered so far, the respondents shall consider and pass orders on the claim of the petitioner within a reasonable time preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

ra

To

1.The State of Tamilnadu
rep. By the Secretary to Govt.,
Technical Education Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai-9.

2.The Director of Technical Education,
Guindy,
Chennai 25

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *