S Sunanda Rathan vs The Bangalore City Co Operative … on 3 November, 2010

4
5. The afore-extracted decision was followed in the case

of NANJAPPA SETTY PALYA BANK COLONY sOc1ET¥_ v.

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY report,ed_'44'_»iVn_'4:E~§tRV.A

1996 KAR 1723 and of sun. GEETHAV__ 'R_: 

COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER in w';R';N£i.1*z99e[:2oV1Vo'§'~'VV 

6. Following the aforesaidisdecisions,'xi 

petitions with a direction to the   issue the
Khatha certificate to the   of  sites in
question. The respo.ndentvANo.;'Z:~.is'-Vtiiietectedl':~.n*-ot to defer the
issuance of Khatha  are not released
for aliotment.  respondent No.2 to

examine the envtiAtEenie_n»_t=Vof»th’O.,__peti’tioners in all other aspects.
The respondefntV_LI’\i0.2′ take a decision in the matter
within one ‘rnonthuafronj”t’hedate of the production of the certified

co_p3é’/”ofV&toti.a3}”s ordéer. H fffff H

Z?if”T.–These”‘_’petitEo:ns are accordingly disposed of. No order as

to costs.

we
Tii’d§’~’é’