High Court Kerala High Court

S.Vijayan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 30 October, 2007

Kerala High Court
S.Vijayan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 30 October, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12207 of 2007(C)


1. S.VIJAYAN, PRIYANKA HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

4. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER,

5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

6. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :30/10/2007

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J.
                            ----------------------
                       W.P.C.No.12207 of 2007
                      ----------------------------------------
               Dated this the 30th day of October 2007

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the father of the deceased, a married woman,

with one child. She had fallen in love with her husband and their

marriage was performed. Her husband had subsequently secured

employment abroad. She, along with her child was residing in India

and her husband was residing abroad in connection with his work.

The husband’s people did not relish the marriage of the petitioner’s

daughter and there are allegations that the relatives of the husband

were mentally inflicting pain on the deceased. The husband of the

deceased had insisted that she must reside with his grandmother’s

younger sister, one Nalini and she was therefore residing there. The

child of the deceased was residing with the parents of the deceased at

their house. The deceased and her husband had a house of their own.

She allegedly used to go from the house of her husband’s

grandmother’s sister to her own house during morning hours and

return in the night. There are allegations that a maternal aunt of the

husband of the deceased and her second husband who reside near the

house of the husband of the deceased have been causing trauma to

the deceased. The mother of the deceased used to visit her frequently

at her own house. On the date of occurrence, that is 8/8/2004, the

mother of the deceased had come to the house of the deceased and

she had spent some time there. She had returned and it is the case of

W.P.C.No.12207/07 2

the police now that when she left, there was nothing to suggest or

apprehend any intention on the part of the deceased to commit suicide.

2. A little later, smoke was seen coming out from the house of

the deceased. It was found that she was doused with kerosene and was

set ablaze. A crime was registered under the caption ‘unnatural death’

under Section 174 Cr.P.C. Investigation commenced. Later, allegation

under Section 306 read with 34 I.P.C has been raised against the

maternal aunt and her husband. The final report has not been filed yet.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that no proper, effective and efficient

investigation has been conducted. He prays that the CBI may be directed

to conduct the investigation.

3. I have perused the case diary in detail. I have heard the

learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor in detail.

The learned Standing Counsel for CBI has also been heard.

4. The petitioner has been running from pillar to post

complaining about the inadequate investigation in the crime. According

to the petitioner, no proper investigation has been conducted so far and

the investigators have not really come into grips with the issues involved.

The petitioner relies on various circumstances to advance his contentions

that it could not have been a case of suicide at all. I do not intend to be

exhaustive but I must take note of the most important contentions which

appear to influence me and create in me a sense of dissatisfaction about

W.P.C.No.12207/07 3

the nature and quality of the investigation and the outcome thereof. The

circumstances are:

i) The deceased, if she had committed suicide, must have

disrobed herself almost completely and kept her clothes nearby inside

the room and doused herself with kerosene before she set herself ablaze.

No explanation whatsoever is yet available to explain such grossly

improbable conduct of a young woman disrobing herself completely

before choosing to commit suicide.

ii) The room inside which the deceased is alleged to have set

herself ablaze did not indicate any panic on the part of the deceased or

movements in panic by her to suggest such theory of suicide by fire.

iii) The empty can in which kerosene was brought and poured

over her is found outside the room which was seen closed. No

explanation has so far been offered as to how the can alone could be

found outside the room if it were a case of suicide by her inside the room.

iv) Indications galore to suggest that soot particles had not gone

into her lungs and this is relied on as a circumstance to suggest that

burning must have been subsequent to her death.

v) Though, no specific injuries are seen noted in the postmortem

certificate, the photographs suggest that the deceased had some injuries

on her person which remain unexplained.

W.P.C.No.12207/07 4

vi) The deceased was found in a sitting position in a chair and

this, it is urged, is indicative of her being placed in that position and set

ablaze. The burnt plastic parts of the chair were found adherent to her

buttocks.

vii) Alcohol was detected in the stomach contents of the

deceased.

5. I shall not from the above circumstances venture to make a

comment at this stage as to whether the case was one of murder or

suicide. Suffice it to say that I feel that there has not been sufficient and

adequate investigation in the matter so far. I am satisfied that the

investigation deserves to be entrusted to more competent and expert

hands to unravel the mystery of the death of the deceased. From the

point of view of the relatives of the deceased, from the point of view of

the civil society as also from the point of view of those charged with the

responsibility for maintenance of law and order, it is essential that a

complete, competent, exhaustive and efficient enquiry is conducted to

ascertain the real cause of death.

6. The thought as to the agency to whom the investigation must

be entrusted does worry me. It may not be possible for this court to

direct that the investigation in all such difficult cases be entrusted to the

CBI. But in this case, I do note that the petitioner has been running from

pillar to post and had in fact got orders in his favour calling upon the

W.P.C.No.12207/07 5

police authorities of the State to conduct a proper and efficient

investigation from the highest level. Directions have been given; but they

have not been proved to be productive. In these circumstances, though

conscious of the burden of the work which the CBI has to perform, I am

satisfied that the interests of justice in the peculiar facts and

circumstances of this case, must persuade this court to direct the CBI to

take over the investigation in this case.

7. In the result, this petition is allowed. It is directed that crime

No.114/04 of Thumba police station, which is now being investigated by

the CBCID (crime No.16/CR/TVPM/2005) shall be continued by the sixth

respondent, CBI.

8. I think it apposite to direct the State Government to make all

facilities available to the CBI in the form of men and facilities to conduct

a proper and efficient investigation. I do not want the State to lose sight

of the fact that this court is constrained to direct the CBI to conduct the

investigation because investigation by the State police force is found to

be inadequate and not sufficient. That must impress upon the State the

burden of responsibility on it to render necessary assistance to the CBI.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

W.P.C.No.12207/07 6

W.P.C.No.12207/07 7

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007