High Court Karnataka High Court

Sabdat @ Hussain Khan vs State By Anekal P S on 4 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sabdat @ Hussain Khan vs State By Anekal P S on 4 November, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


WY Vtw:c*Iw3″‘%%lflu.lE W:tf5′!&’ ||fVfl”$lW4|ftW#”‘iE£&”%3\J”% fififififlfil ‘Q|v’uu?W:WW%rV5 W9?! |HWl’1!hK’G&”‘¢aIrtP’?XLR\£l”l IIEWWLE Esflflfifllmi
‘ WU’i I’&fl”®KHmW&””Vmfll”&C’WJf”I IIIEII WW3″! Wflfi 5E’VMI”‘IE’%F#’fl”‘Mi3fl””F|\J”W. il%I’5ulflW “4wWnI’WFKK3l ‘Ufl’K6 lQ’%£§””‘fi.#VlW$'”‘&Ilfi”‘UW3P”W|. Qilflfifllfl
A Vuwwa

Thb peflflonh med unda Section 438
orcfiz P:-ocadura, mm am-. this

«vent. of the’: trust in

Police Sufism, hr the
Sections an… as of Fnreet_’_Adt,

smmnsm ofIPC. _

with ca-im Ho.69i1989

%

_ _ wfl the %po1-mfion cf cams!

W

F3 ‘4am’izJ’M?9’ki’# WW mnnaimamnm XHMWFIBN wmmmumumrwn llfiwll wwwma VJ! a\r\.ncus~nw-«aura IIIVYKI wwun: was v:\.r§n.iua-tut-umrs Iwmrun Mum”: ww wmwanmwrmnruuwwn wlgwsm -wurwn

bail.

5. Rh&wmmmmmmmm§Q@§¢m@&@$m

caukl mt be eecm-e d case has

6. with so dkposed of.

“wflwA ….. JUDGE

mmfiawmMhymmummg$ryunMammg§fi_