High Court Karnataka High Court

Sabiha Naaz vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its Secy on 2 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sabiha Naaz vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Its Secy on 2 June, 2009
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
eamawram %wmv3?i.;«fi5?%=fl WW ¥9&.fi%%%"W?'33u§§&.%M;      '

 

ntnmmmiocxrnwovxnmmmmxrmnaanm
DATED THIS ma 2:» my on JUNE 2009 N 
BE   %  

sauna mu:  
nionnmmmso anus  
man ABOUT 15  *  L
no-.16, mow swan; _ L  g  x 
01.9 auauepzm Pawn !£aI?l' R0§\!3,,.-._  
wsaawae:-29.  %_  é
macs uruqa,   _,    
am 33' HER :2-man % 

     emxuoxaa

(By sri   V J
SIN!)  ' V   

1 31'ATE'{§£'_EI.§fi.?_$ATA!(A

j "  B'°E'.,I_!'P$ 8§ERK'!'ARY'
    0E'E91--,%':fiTI@J
" .V  'K' S EHILBIHG,

 

  
»  SEGONDARY EDUCATIOH
" mcmxuamzca: scam, nmamnam,
'1,a:€m.\was

" , 3 ma enmczaan.
  mrav Pas: UHIVEREITY comma FOR mum
III anccx, JAYIHAGAR
ameamna 560 911  RESPOEIDEIITE

[By Brim. umzowuz, may

f8V}.Ea'PA:.ai$mma. wu



3

SEE board vh., Knuth seoondnuy Education
Exnn:ixutionBoard,ik:ruhedi:ucmdt:nantau'tbaa 

ms of urn-:1: of fin petitioner in am: nun-In mrd  
17.11.1993

instead of 17.11.1995. ma pet1tbnea’

aha frayed fir . direction to tha
oonega to admit the petitioner to mum ‘ Mk

2. The dooumm at apt ma
cu-mum awed by
smaimuon of the

in has obtainnd80.80%
nInnI:oned’ inthoaaid
oerhmxmain not iuuedby ma
§§mmaqEducwon Examination Board at
cm tin board 1:… mt me. the

1 me¢£ha-thaw» mmm As a the
mmmonm pamm” reveal an ha ms of

% in 17.11.19». wvbusw. the name me at math

wfib Sfl£m&&mdm

fix/>

4

The circular tamed by the atste <3-dvvernmant
&at;ed:2.5.20G0 clearly muxsum the patitiana has to gag
doc:-M flan: the Civil court far g%g the correction v– . : _

881.0 eutificato. Sinus the pfitiaau ha already .

881.6 course, it is open £0: than ,

('fi\flCourtforgoI:tingthsdaI:o int).-.ca-in

carbficnts if the entrant am of
881.0 ca-tificste. Hence no

3. 8:: far gm is

mawnu wwwmi Mil” mnmmmwmmw fllwfl MWMKE WW Kflflwfliflflfl HXHH Léifimfliu K3?” fifififwflffififi

wfla PUG «mama as 5 readm-

fiincg iawxaaa minituutn age prescribed, thug

– _____ r”?m&%t° the . bu
, than is nortlmg on record to show

iwnflmn IJPWAHQ WQIVJM it

rupondw: collage has 1.-fined to mm the

_ mxuw afthn mm, the lpguuhcnninn nfths:
_ am. an man not he admiud to the collage in
i;%r;iuutifiedundarfizefIctI&.ci:’emIun¢eIafflaeeue.Ith£u’mc

am x-aw-vu. xttmvtvowtvzw vmwmummsnn mm’:

‘,J>

5

pefltiomr no appmoaa $9 third mpondem alongwith
maria and me am of ham certificate as

by tha Ichnal hum which aha pained the
akmswnh other mm mr gowns the {
such an appliation in and by ma £9:
“mum ma mi mpomm

“3:

with me abxuasa 1.