IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
FA No.128 of 2007
SACHIDANAND PRASAD @ SACHIDANA .
Versus
BIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA & ORS .
-----------
09. 04.11.2010. Heard the parties on Interlocutory Application
No.5837 of 2007.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the appellant
seeks permission to make necessary correction in paragraph
2 of the said Interlocutory Application. Permission accorded.
This Interlocutory Application has been filed for
substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased
appellant No.1. The sons are already on record as appellant
No.2 to 7 only, the widow and the one daughter as
mentioned in detail in paragraph 1 are required to be
substituted. Accordingly, the substitution application is
allowed and the widow and the daughter as stated above are
substituted in place of the appellant No.1. The I.A. No.5837
stands allowed.
The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that
he has already served the copy of the affidavit showing
jointness today itself. The learned counsel for the
respondent admits this fact.
So far I.A. No.5389 of 2008 is concerned, as prayed
for by learned counsel for the appellant, put up on 19th
November, 2010 under the same heading.
Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)
2