High Court Kerala High Court

Sadanandan vs Manoj Kumar (Owner) on 17 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sadanandan vs Manoj Kumar (Owner) on 17 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 37 of 2004()


1. SADANANDAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MANOJ KUMAR (OWNER),
                       ...       Respondent

2. MUNEER @ MUHAMMED RAFEEQUE (DRIVER),

3. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.MANU

                For Respondent  :SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :17/12/2008

 O R D E R
                       M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                   M.A.C.A. NO. 37 OF 2004
              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 17th day of December, 2008.

                       J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Punalur in O.P.(MV)1723/99. The

claimant, a 42 year old man sustained injuries in a road

accident and the Tribunal has awarded a compensation of

Rs.48,701/-. It is against that decision the claimant has

come up in appeal.

2. Heard the counsel for the appellant as well as the

insurance company. It is seen that the claimant sustained a

compressed fracture on the T-12 vertebra and he was

initially treated as an inpatient in the hospital from 16.6.99

to 25.6.99. The discharge card, Exts.P7 would reveal that he

had been again admitted on 4.2.2001 and discharged on

26.2.01. Ext.A10 is the disability certificate whereby his

percentage of disability is fixed at 25%. The Tribunal fixed

his income at Rs.1,800/- per month, disability at 10% and

awarded the compensation. It can be seen from the

M.A.C.A. 37 OF 2004
-:2:-

materials available that the claimant had sustained a fracture

on the vertebra and had undergone treatment and had

sustained disability. It is true that the doctor has not been

examined to prove the real percentage of disability. So the

Tribunal only assessed the disability at 10%. Considering

the fact that he had sustained a fracture on the vertebra that

too at the age of 42 I am inclined to increase the disability

by 3% and award the compensation. When it is so for 3%

disability the additional compensation would come to

Rs.9,450/-, i.e., Rs.21,000 x 3 x 15/100. The Tribunal has

only awarded Rs.7,000/- towards pain and sufferings which

also requires enhancement. I grant an amount of Rs.3,000/-

more considering the long treatment he had undergone.

Similarly, towards loss of earnings one more month’s amount

is to be granted which will make the total compensation to

Rs.14,250/-.

In the result the MACA is partly allowed and the

claimant is awarded an additional compensation of

Rs.14,250/- with 7.5% interest on the said sum from the

M.A.C.A. 37 OF 2004
-:3:-

date of petition till realisation and the insurance company is

directed to deposit the same within a period of sixty days

from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-