High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Saddam @ Bhura vs The State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Saddam @ Bhura vs The State Of Bihar on 25 March, 2011
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Cr.Misc. No.8566 of 2011
            SADDAM @ BHURA, S/o Brija Thakur @ Najimullah.
                               Versus
                        THE STATE OF BIHAR
                              -----------

02. 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

that with regard to the motor-cycle allegedly recovered

from the house of the petitioner there is no parent case of

theft and the petitioner has remained in custody since

29.12.2010 and has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the same, let the petitioner, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in

connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 269 of 2010

subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the

brother of the petitioner namely Md. Alam. The bailor will

also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change
2

in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit

shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two

given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on

each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-