Safiyamma. vs State Of Kerala on 14 June, 2010

0
68
Kerala High Court
Safiyamma. vs State Of Kerala on 14 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 17505 of 2010(K)


1. SAFIYAMMA.,W/O.SAKKEER,KUNNAPPALLY HOUSE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, RERPESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE,

3. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE

4. THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER,

5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :14/06/2010

 O R D E R
                        ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   -------------------------
                   W.P.(C.) No.17505 of 2010 (K)
             ---------------------------------
              Dated, this the 14th day of June, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner’s main complaint is that in the matter of

selection to the post of Anganwadi Workers, she has been wrongly

denied marks, which are provided for in Ext.P4. To substantiate this

contention, referring to Ext.P5, the learned counsel contends that

although to the inmates of SWD (Social Welfare Department) Hostel,

marks are provided, no mark has been awarded to the petitioner. It

is on this basis, challenge has been raised.

2. However, the learned Government Pleader referring to

Ext.P4 Government Order providing the guidelines states that marks

are to be awarded to the inmates of hostels, which are under the

control of the SWD. Reference in this connection is made to Clause

12 of Ext.P4. It is stated that Ext.P1 is the certificate produced by

the petitioner and that the said certificate has been issued by the

Board of Control of Orphanages and Other Charitable Homes, which

is not an establishment under the control of SWD.

WP(C) No.17505/2010
-2-

3. Column 12 of Ext.P4 provides that inmates of hostels

under the control of SWD are eligible for marks as provided therein.

Admittedly, Ext.P1 certificate produced, at best, is issued by an

organisation recognised by the SWD, and it is not a hostel under the

control of the SWD.

If so, as rightly contended by the learned Government Pleader,

the petitioner can have no grievance.

The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *