IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 1293 of 2011
1. Sagar Gorai @ Sgar Gorain
2. Govind Gorai @ Govind Kumar Gorai
3. Nimai Gorai @ Nimain Gorain ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate
For the State : A.P.P.
-----
3/06.06.2011
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. appearing for the State.
The petitioners are accused in a case instituted under Sections
304/34 of Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that these
petitioners being father-in-law, brothers-in-law, and also other persons
including the husband of the deceased, have been alleged to have
committed dowry death of the deceased but from the statement made in
the FIR, it would appear that the allegation of demand of dowry was
mainly against the husband and not against these petitioners and,
therefore, there was no reason on the part of these petitioners to
commit offence of dowry death and that no external injuries have been
found on the person of the deceased and that it is said that the deceased
was poisoned to death but the police without getting the Viscera report
submitted the charge-sheet under Section 304B of I.P.C. and under
these circumstances, these petitioners deserve to be admitted to bail.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, all
three above-named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Nirsa (Kalubathan) P.S.
Case No. 268 of 2010 arising out of G.R. No. 3844 of 2010.
(R.R. Prasad, J.)
AKT