High Court Kerala High Court

Sahakarana Kalluchethu … vs K.V.Kuriakose on 13 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sahakarana Kalluchethu … vs K.V.Kuriakose on 13 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 48 of 2010()


1. SAHAKARANA KALLUCHETHU VYAVASAYA SANGHOM
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.V.KURIAKOSE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,

3. THE LABOUR COURT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.C.JOHN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.S.R.BANNURMATH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :13/01/2010

 O R D E R
                     S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. &
                   Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
                 ------------------------------------------
                       W.A. No.48 of 2010
                 ------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010

                               ORDER

S.R.Bannurmath, C.J.

The writ petitioner, aggrieved by the judgment of the

learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No.31125 of 2009 only

on the ground of delay and laches, has approached this Court in the

present writ appeal.

2. The appellant society suffered the award Ext.P6

from the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad passed in the year 2006. It

is after nearly three years the present writ petition challenging the

award has been filed. Taking into consideration the long

inordinate delay, especially when the appellant did participate in

the Dispute proceedings and was aware of the award, its inaction

or sleeping over for three years, the learned Single Judge held that

the delay was unpardonable.

W.A. No.48 of 2010
2

3. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that on

the basis of the award, a claim petition is filed under Section

33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act and the same is pending

consideration. In view of the pendency of the proceedings

under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, it is open

for the appellant to agitate all the matters coming within the

purview and as such that has nothing to do with the dismissal of

the writ petition on the ground of delay and laches.

Hence, we do not find any reason to disturb the

judgment of the learned Single Judge. We find no merit in the

writ appeal and the same is dismissed.

S.R.Bannurmath,
Chief Justice

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,
Judge
vns