Saheb Hussain vs The Secretary District Wakf … on 27 March, 2008

IN THE HIGH comm cm KARNATAKA AT BANGALQREV
Dated this the 27"' day of March, 2003 - I   . jj  EA " 

Before

 Pe.=':.':-.'.4::: 29.994 Lzaes   *

Saheb  Sir: fvifihafxifiéd K.'najg~  -.  =  "
68 yrs, Agrieulturist '   -_  . V "
W0 Kongancia Viiiage, Shahapur_TTal11k  

Gulbarga District Petitioner

1 Secfimg, ,D:s!.*1'.=.F "n'ar:f C<m*.n'ut"°
C' barga V

2. sn' Ammm % 'ii;'~4'V5":;§.r';s,:z45\.';1~;:-_i"¢i1V'l'.1'urist
S/'o Biiimasimiz §-__Iaw*aiciar'
' : 'Rfo.Kongaza(1j',  Shahpur Tq, Gulbarga

.%  'mud "I'1i1?_1lna1, snaha      pur
  Byiia Chairman

   ' Sxt.3t$.Of_ I<.am'  V V ' ataka --- by its Secfetary

L.-,.:-.."'.:mer.t, 'iifiaaa Saadha

 " Bazmgaidre 1 Respondents

 4" L * . (By Sri Naciiga Shivanandappa, GP for R3-4;
  Vémash 'B Pntii, Adv. for R1; M3 9.1:
_   Adv. for R1)

H   This Writ Petition is filed under An.226/227 9, mg c_1-ns::.-.i«.m.'
 prayingtoquashthe order dated 27.1.1988 --annexure H.

\§P_/
4\



This Writ Petition coming on for Prl. Hearing this day, the  made
the following: - W   '2.

ORDER

Petitioner has sought for quashing the order: {if file’ vviffihuntti,

Shahpur dated 27.1.1988.

Heard the counsel for «_peti_tioner c~sndv\»ti:e.counseii rejaresenting the
respondent and the Government P1céde§~;i”

It appears’ while making grant in favour of
the respondent, to the petitioner,…hi1s shown the land granted to the

uncle of the ‘-pet’i:ioner:’-ssh the respondent. This aspect requires

._ ‘fite”e.ircdtmitances, the Assistant Commissioner is directed to rectify

_ the mistake” if ~any, committed by him in passing the impugned order dated

:’2′!.A.lV,198i§’vVai’ter due notice to both the parties. Petition is disposed of’

_ iiaecerdingly.

An sdi-2
Tufiqe