IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.1062 of 2006
SAHEB PRASAD SINGH @ SAHAB PRASAD SINGH SON
OF LATE NAND LAL SINGH RESIDENT OF
RATANPATII, P.S. SURYAPURA, ROHTAS.
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
COMMISSIONE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
3. DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE, BIHAR, PATNA.
4. ZILA PADADHIKARIK, KROHTAS
5. DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER,
ROHTAS.
6. PROJECT EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
BIKRAMGANJ, ROHTAS.
7. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
KARAKAT BLOCK, ROHTAS.
-----------
2 01/10/2010 Petitioner retired from service in the year 2001.
He is claiming benefit of promotion/notional promotion
from the year 1991 as some kind of policy decision was
taken to grant promotion to such persons who had
acquired a degree in Agriculture and had required
experience. Petitioner is supposed to have had both but
his case was not considered.
This Court is not required to look into the matter
for the simple reason that it is a belated kind of stale
claim which has been made in the writ after more than
four years of his retirement and that too claiming such a
benefit for which cause of action arose more than two
-2-
decades ago.
This writ application is dismissed on that ground
alone as the claim raised by the petitioner is more
academic than based on any substantive right accruing to
him.
AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)