High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Saheb Singh vs Central Bank Of India Thru. Br on 16 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Saheb Singh vs Central Bank Of India Thru. Br on 16 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          CWJC No.11250 of 2011
                   Saheb Singh son of Chandrika Singh, resident of village-Bhawal, Police
                   Station- Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran (Bettiah).
                                                                            ..... Petitioner.
                                                    Versus
                   1. Central Bank of India through its Branch Manager, Kandhwaliya
                       having its Head Office at.....
                   2. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Kandhwaliya Branch
                       Kandhwaliya, Police Station- Ram Nagar, District-West
                       Champarana (Bettiah).
                   3. The District Certificate Officer, West Champaran (Bettiah).
                                                                        .......Respondents.
                                                -----------

For the petitioner : Mr. Bakshi S.R.P.Sinha, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For respondent nos.1 &2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For respondent no.3 : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, Advocate.

———-

04/ 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

counsel for the Central Bank of India and its authority and learned

counsel for the District Certificate Officer, West Champaran.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

challenging notice dated 31.03.2011 issued by the Certificate

Officer, West Champaran under Section 7 of the Bihar & Orissa

Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 in Certificate Case No. 160

of 2010-11 and for other ancillary reliefs.

3. After considering the averments made by learned

counsel for the parties and the materials on record, it is quite

apparent that against the said notice the petitioner should have

filed an objection under Section 9 of the Act before the said

authority who was competent to decide all the issues raised by the

petitioner.

-2-

4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ

petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file his

objection under Section 9 of the Act along with the requisite as

well as a copy of this order. If such an objection is filed by the

petitioner within fifteen days from today, the said authority shall

decide it on merits in accordance with law within two months

thereafter. Till the said objection is decided no coercive action

shall be taken against the petitioner.

5. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said

order of the authority under Section 10 of the Act, he will be at

liberty to challenge the same before the appellate forum provided

in the Act.

(S. N. Hussain, J.)
Sunil