IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bail Appl..No. 7483 of 2008()
1. SAIDALAVI, S/O.ABOOBACKER,
... Petitioner
2. NOUSHAD, S/O.MOIDUTTY,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA
Dated :19/12/2008
O R D E R
K. HEMA, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B.A. No.7483 of 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 19th day of December,2008
O R D E R
Petition for bail.
2. The alleged offence is under section 395 IPC.
According to prosecution, 1st accused pointed out de facto
complainant to 2nd accused who, thereafter, pointed him to
accused 3 to 5. Those people arranged accused nos. 6 to 9 to
robbery and by snatching away Rs.26 lakhs which is hawala
money.
3. Petitioners are accused nos.1 and 3. They were
arrested on 25-10-2008. Learned counsel for petitioners
submitted that even as per the prosecution case, petitioners’
role is only in pointing out de facto complainant to others who
are actually involved in the commission of offence.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that he has no
objection in granting bail but stringent conditions may be
imposed.
5. Hence, petitioners shall be released on bail on their
executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties
each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
Magistrate, on the following conditions:-
1) Petitioners shall report before the
BA 7483/08 -2-
Investigating Officer on every Monday,
Wednesday and Saturday between 10
a.m. and 1 p.m. until further orders.
2) Petitioners shall not leave the limits of the
police station within which the crime is
registered except with the prior
permission of the learned Magistrate.
3) Petitioners shall not intimidate or influence
any witness or tamper with evidence or
commit any offence while on bail and in
case breach of this condition, bail is liable
to be cancelled.
This petition is allowed.
K.HEMA, JUDGE.
mn.