High Court Kerala High Court

Saidu vs The District Collector on 28 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Saidu vs The District Collector on 28 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14722 of 2009(I)


1. SAIDU,S/O.KHADER,MOONANGADI,P.P.KARA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,MALAPPURAM.
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE TAHSILDAR,TIRUR.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,TIRUR.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :28/05/2009

 O R D E R
                             V.GIRI,J.
                      -------------------------
                  W.P ( C) No.14722 of 2009
                      --------------------------
                Dated this the 28th May,2009

                        J U D G M E N T

Petitioner claims to be the owner of a Mini Lorry

bearing Reg.No.KL-11-K 5148 which was seized on

5.5.2009 when it was transporting river sand. According

to the Petitioner, the sand was being transported with

the aid of a valid permit. Subsequent to the seizure, the

petitioner moved the concerned Magistrate with an

application for release of the vehicle, which was

dismissed. Petitioner is aggrieved that no further steps

have been taken in the matter of release of the vehicle.

2. When the vehicle is seized, the same will have

to be produced before the District Collector who will have

to proceed in terms of Section 23 of the Kerala Protection

of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act

read with Rules 27 and 28 of the Rules. It is up to the

petitioner to approach the District Collector for release of

the petitioner’s vehicle, which has not been done so far.

W.P ( C) No.14722 of 2009
2

2. In the result, it is ordered that if the petitioner

files an application before the District Collector for release

of the vehicle, the same shall be dealt with in accordance

with law in the light of the observations contained in

Shoukathali Vs. Tahasildar [2009 (1) KLT 640,

Subramanian Vs. State of Kerala [2009 (1) KLT 77) and the

judgment in WPC No.14319 of 2009. Final orders shall be

passed within three months. But if an application for

interim custody of the vehicle is filed, it shall be dealt with

and orders shall be passed subject to the conditions

indicated in Shoukathali Vs. Tahasildar [2009 (1) KLT 640,

Subramanian Vs. State of Kerala [2009 (1) KLT 77) and the

judgment in WPC No.14319 of 2009 within three weeks

from the date on which the application is filed.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(V.GIRI,JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No.14722 of 2009
3

W.P ( C) No.14722 of 2009
4