Loading...
Responsive image

Sailesh Kumar.T vs State Of Kerala on 22 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sailesh Kumar.T vs State Of Kerala on 22 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 9621 of 2009(W)


1. SAILESH KUMAR.T.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CONTROLLERS, LEGAL METROLOGY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF

                For Respondent  :DR.VINCENT PANIKULANGARA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :22/05/2009

 O R D E R
                           P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
                      -------------------------------------
                        W.P.(C)No.9621 of 2009
                     --------------------------------------
                         Dated 22nd May, 2009

                                JUDGMENT

Sri.S.Muhammed Haneef, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner submits that the Government have revoked the order

of suspension and reinstated the petitioner in service. He also submits

that the petitioner has thereupon joined duty as Assistant Controller of

Legal Metrology in Malappuram District. The learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that in these circumstances no further orders are

called for in this writ petition and that it may be dismissed as

infructuous. The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is

dismissed as infructuous.

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Judge

TKS

P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

————————————-
I.A.No.4871 of 2009 in
W.P.(C)No.9621 of 2009

————————————–

Dated 22nd May, 2009

ORDER

Dr.Vincent Panikulangara, the learned counsel appearing

for the applicant submits that the writ petitioner was placed under

suspension on a complaint filed by the applicant and therefore the

applicant is a necessary party in this writ petition. In the light of the

fact that the Government have revoked the order of suspension and

reinstated the petitioner in service, the request made by the applicant

cannot be entertained. The I.A. is accordingly closed.

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Judge

TKS

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information