Gujarat High Court High Court

Saiyad vs State on 20 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Saiyad vs State on 20 April, 2011
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/4965/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 4965 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 1022 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SAIYAD
SALIM MIRSAHEBMIYA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
TEJAS M BAROT for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR. R.C. KODEKAR, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 20/04/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Rule.

Learned APP, Mr. R.C. Kodekar waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of respondent no.1-State.

By
way of present application, the applicant has prayed to modify
condition no.(e) of the bail order dated 15.3.2011 passed by this
Court in Criminal Misc. Application No.1022 of 2011.

Heard
learned counsel Mr. Tejas M. Barot for the applicant. Mr. Barot has
contended that since 26.1.2011 there is a bifurcation of Kadi Police
Station and now new police station is established named as Nandasan
Police Station and both the applicant and respondent no.2 are covered
within the area of Nandasan Police Station. Therefore, condition
no.(e) of the order dated 15.3.2011 may be modified to the extent
that now the respondent no.2 shall not enter into the area of
Nandasan Police Station instead of Kadi Police Station.

I
have perused the papers produced before me and also consider the
submissions advanced by Mr. Tejas M. Barot for the applicant. From
the perusal, it appears that since 26.1.2011 there is a bifurcation
between Kadi Police Station and Nandasan Police Station and now the
applicant and the respondent no.2 are covered within the jurisdiction
of Nandasan Police Station. Hence, I am of the opinion that looking
to the bifurcation of police stations, it is appropriate to modify
the condition no.(e) of the bail order dated 15.3.2011.

In
view of above, present application is partly allowed. The respondent
no.2 is directed not to enter in the area of Nandasan Police Station
till the trial is over, except for attending the trial. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent only.

(Z.K.SAIYED,J.)

Vahid

   

Top