High Court Kerala High Court

Sajeesh T.R. vs The Station House Office on 22 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sajeesh T.R. vs The Station House Office on 22 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 105 of 2009()


1. SAJEESH T.R., AGED 33 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SUMATHI, W/O. RAVINDRANATHAN, AGED
3. SANIL T.R., AGED 38 YEARS,
4. SUMESH T.R., AGED 31 YEARS,
5. LEENA T.R., W/O. DILEEPKUMAR,

                        Vs



1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.MADHU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :22/07/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No.105 of 2009
                ------------------------------------
              Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2009

                           O R D E R

The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.4/2009

of Mannuthi Police Station. They filed this Bail Application under

Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure apprehending

arrest on an accusation of having committed offences under

Sections 403, 406, 420 and 498 A read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

2. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

19/06/2009, the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for

the defacto complainant submitted that the case may be posted

for mediation. Accordingly, the matter was referred to Kerala

High Court Legal Services Authority for placing the matter before

the Mediation Centre. It is submitted by the counsel on either

side that Adv. G. Krishnakumari, was appointed as Mediator. The

Mediator persuaded the parties to arrive at a settlement. Report

dated 20/07/2009 is filed by the Mediator. Now the disputes and

differences between the parties have been amicably settled. The

report submitted by the Mediator is taken on record.

B.A. No.105/2009
Page numbers

3. In view of the settlement as aforesaid, the learned

Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners will not be

arrested in Crime No.4/2009. This submission is recorded.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned counsel for the defacto complainant submitted that either

side will pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- each to the Mediator. This

submission is also recorded.

The Bail application is disposed of in the above terms, in

view of the settlement.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm