High Court Kerala High Court

Sajeev vs State Of Krala on 20 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sajeev vs State Of Krala on 20 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2273 of 2010()


1. SAJEEV, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.SIVADASAN -
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SANKARAN, AGED 34,CHIRAYIL PUTHENVEEDU,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KRALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN

 Dated :20/04/2010

 O R D E R
                     V. K.MOHANAN, J.
              ----------------------------------------
            Bail Application No. 2273 of 2010
             -----------------------------------------
         Dated this the 20th day of April, 2010.

                           O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the

petitioners who are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime

No.342/2010 of Anchalumoodu Police Station for an offence

punishable under the provisions of I.P.C., seek anticipatory

bail.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations

levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances

of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-

in-charge of the police station concerned to release the

petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of

their arrest in connection with the above case on each of

them executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Bail A.No.2273 of 2010
2

Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like

amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to

the following conditions:

1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating
Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all
Wednesdays.

2. Petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation as and when required by the
Investigating Officer.

3. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the
prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to
tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on
bail.

5. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate
concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be

cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

V.K.MOHANAN,

JUDGE

ami/