Sajeevan & Another vs State Of Kerala on 16 August, 2006

0
115
Kerala High Court
Sajeevan & Another vs State Of Kerala on 16 August, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 2783 of 2006()



1. SAJEEVAN & ANOTHER
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.LEAN JOSE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :16/08/2006

 O R D E R
                                  R. BASANT, J.
                           - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                         Crl.R.P.No.  2783  of   2006
                          -  - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                 Dated this the  16th day of   August, 2006


                                      O R D E R

This revision petition is directed against the concurrent verdict

of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section 324

I.P.C.

2. When this revision petition came up for hearing, it is

submitted at the Bar by counsel for the rival contestants that the

matter has been settled and the offence has been compounded by the

defacto complainant/PW1. A joint compromise petition duly signed

by the rival contestants and counter signed by their respective

counsel is also filed. Both pray that the application may be accepted

and the composition approved.

3. From the submissions made at the Bar and the joint

application filed by the parties, I am satisfied that the parties have

willingly, voluntarily and genuinely settled their disputes and the

defacto complainant has compounded the offence. The offence is

Crl.R.P.No. 2783 of 2006 2

compoundable under Section 320(2) Cr.P.C. and permission of the Court

is required. Since the composition is at the stage of revision, permission

under Section 320(6) Cr.P.C. is also required. In the facts and

circumstances I am satisfied that such permission can be granted and the

composition can be accepted.

4. In the result:

(a) Crl.M.A.No. 8093 of 2006 is allowed granting the requisite

leave under Sections 320(2) and 320(6) Cr.P.C. and the composition is

accepted.

(b) The acceptance of the composition shall have the effect of

acquittal of the accused of the offences alleged as stipulated under Section

320(8) Cr.P.C.

) Consequently, this revision petition is allowed. The impugned

judgments are set aside. The bail bond executed by the accused shall stand

discharged and he is set at liberty.

(R. BASANT)

Crl.R.P.No. 2783 of 2006 3

Judge

tm

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *