IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bail Appl..No. 6119 of 2010()
1. SAJUDHEEN, AGED 36 YEARS,
... Petitioner
2. BIJUDHEEN, AGED 40 YEARS,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.LIJU. M.P
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
Dated :06/10/2010
O R D E R
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Bail Application No.6119 of 2010
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dated this the 6th day of October, 2010
ORDER
Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime
No.226/2009 of Peechi Police Station for offences punishable
under Sections 363 and 323 read with 34 I.P.C, seek anticipatory
bail. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioners
before the J.F.C.M Court-III, Thrissur in C.C.No.715/2009, non-
bailable warrant of arrest are pending against the petitioners.
2. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the
process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no
reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the
J.F.C.M Court-III, Thrissur and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the
petitioners surrender before the J.F.C.M Court-III, Thrissur and file
an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the
same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the
same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of
non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners.
This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of.
V. RAMKUMAR,
(JUDGE)
dmb