High Court Jharkhand High Court

Sambhu Mandal vs State Of Jharkhand on 3 August, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Sambhu Mandal vs State Of Jharkhand on 3 August, 2011
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                                 B.A. No.4227 of 2011
                                       ------
            Sambhu Mandal                     ...   ......                  Petitioner
                                       Versus

            The State of Jharkhand               ....   ...   ....    ...       Opp. Party
                                        ------

            CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY
                                     ------
            For the Petitioner       :      Mr. R.C.P. Sah, Advocate
            For the Opp. Party       :      A.P.P.
                                            -----

04 /03.08.2011

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 341,323,325,

448,307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Kharswan P.S. Case

No.50 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. Case No.1029 of 2010 which is pending in the

Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella.

It reveals from the First Information Report that the allegation against the

petitioner is that he had assaulted the informant by means of a sharp cutting weapon

on his head. When the wife of the informant intervened, she was also assaulted as a

result she lost her little finger. The occurrence was the result of a dispute which

occurred due to purchase of fire wood between the informant and the accused.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitionr is in

jail since last seven months and injury was of simple in nature.

Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

It appears that vital part of the body of the informant was injured by sharp

cutting weapon. The wife of the informant also sustained injury and her little finger

chopped of.

Considering the matter, at present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner

on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(D.N. Upadhyay, J)

Sudhir