Sameer.V.A vs Mahathma Gandhi University on 22 August, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25316 of 2008(L)


1. SAMEER.V.A, S/O. V.K. ABHDUL KHADER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.DILIP

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :22/08/2008

 O R D E R
                       S.SIRI JAGAN, J
                ==================
                  W.P(C)No.25316 of 2008
                ==================
        Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008.

                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner appeared for the final semester

examination of his BBA course in April 2006. Dissatisfied with

the results, he applied for improvement examination in April

2008. Still when the results were published the petitioner did

not get the expected marks. Therefore, the petitioner

submitted Ext.P2 application for scrutiny of answer paper and

Ext.P4 application for revaluation. The petitioner seeks a

direction to the respondent to complete the revaluation

process expeditiously. The petitioner also points out that the

petitioner is expected to produce the mark list for further

studies failing which, the petitioner would have to pay much

higher fees.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

University would submit that the University would require at

least two more months’ time to complete the revaluation

process.

3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition

with the following directions:

W.P(C)No.25316 of 2008 – 2 –

Scrutiny of the answer paper, for which the petitioner has

submitted Ext.P2 application, shall be completed within one

week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The

revaluation process shall be completed and results thereof

declared, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

However, in view of the urgency pointed out by the petitioner,

the respondent shall try their best to publish the revaluation

results within the shortest time possible. This is subject to the

further condition that the applications submitted by the

petitioner are in order in all respects.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

rhs