“AB-.:!!”‘l muuxl Ur RAKNRIMRSA HIUH U?’ KARI’-!AfAKA HES?! COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF &(ARNi¥TAKM H16}-3 I
IN THE IEEQ-I CODE’ OF KARE’-tTAI{A AT B
mm THIS am 18″‘ D»: or smmmn, 2003
BHYIKE
TI-IE I-ED]:-I”BLE1~!I§. mass 3 * V
W. P.N’O.10524/2008 cV::.z¢f-c£’C)-
1- saxmxaa 5
3:0 mm ‘A L-
A-339 new 58 ” V
RIAT YE’1’£’AIfl33.’.__ _ %
mmmm ;;ara*§AHnkaaas.T, _
‘a’*’Ifi ‘
TALUKt*’~§’.’3f?1*RRAV33$$ffl…V ‘I’.
2 Imlsi-:Hmm~r.A’ ”
mm
94:3:-:3 35
MAT nanmamm ‘
,=;;*+;LL§-firs
A % ._n1:smIm:
.._’i’fi,Iv£I3″g2«§3\13§I.V$~’ExTE 92.-rxrxonmzs
,_ my ‘5::i__~.- ft, szammva REDDY, am I
ff kxarérmapra
‘*5.-‘6 LATE mwma
‘mm new as mm.-3
RIPE’ YETTELKOIFI VEIAQE
FQST
‘FIE KFLDUGGDI, I.EKI 7
mm :§.._9–.i _ ;é “02: yea gmzmmmx
_ MADE THE
“7. = in ifiifi writ petition, the petitioners
am the order dated 15-97»-zczaoe
V gaaaéfi hf tfle learned Principal Civil Judge
4″” “1§rmQa.i;¢ Mala: rejecting the qgplication
fi§§d°§y them undsr Order VI Rule 1? of the
T – . f(.’.’:5:5.Ts of Civil Pzocedura.
Maw: wwux”E’ am» %.AKN.%l’AKA a-um: 4::;:Qi§7Im C2)!”-‘ KARNATAKA HIGH Comm’ OF KARNAEMm MWH QQUR? GE KARNMMKA Mama QGURT 09 WMNMAKA HIGH 1
@
MWM mmm QF KARNATAKA Him»! gmgxw Cw KARNATAKA Mimi Comm 0:3 Kmmmmm Nllfirl (.;UuKI’ GI” mxmmznm mm-I Luum up amxmmnnn mum a
«L “Ema only ground an whiczh the
b&3.m~r has: refused the prayer fer %
to the plain: is that iii’; pri¢p.§§s=§:1V ‘ 3_
araenfiment is allemed theV9n.’atute “:2f
will be changed and thou:_’fh..VV:.V’t:auseV”~of= ac£;o§i
xwaaina the aaur:ev,i “w~j.th_§ ‘ ifill
introduce al1:egVe’t:heJ:__ c.-:3-.~::=:é%,–‘.1’V_~;v fir-éhich is
ir@m:r:11.’ssiblfl’–
*5. I ‘ Lafifizad ccaunsol for
the parAt:;_e’a ‘ counsel for the
Eaaparmagt {£135. his statement of
“._»:$}::__~’g.a=V:’;”‘.:”.’.:”.:.’3’A.”r%.1’*z-.2 théwsmae is taken on recmrd.
_6. 4311 aatabliahed that if the
figure cut the auit is not altered by
%f.«l*V’2raV:V”»-;;:’r:;:1ac=se:c.i aemenmnent even if what is
‘ _4’z-azaight he be changed is the nature of relief
‘fiezxught for by the plaintiff, the maendmant
naught fan: can be panuitted. The n3.y
/%
….. ‘
‘._Va::<s.*.?;.&t£*; ';aL},.~;;Lfi,;:at1an aeekzng amendment of the
mum Manx: ur anamnmnm mum §m;R1' my KAKNATAKA HIGK €91,331 GE KAKNATAKA HIGH CQURT 05 KARNATAKA HEGH comm mvfi mnmmm HIGH I
and scanners of action is not altered,
amandrasnt is pemiasihla atherwisa,
cénly lead to multiplicity of % 1
ma plaintiff, in the
amt he drivan tc: they gzdéalh' of
aztwthmt suit on the same céiafie cf
8. Thmzefaxe, __in and in
the light <3: Eli}:-;~VVV'i'ih.pex Co-art
srefescred scmght for
deserve}; 1 fihe order uncle':
cfzallengé' "deserves tea be'(_ 35:
asiés ~ petition is allowed
L.
:.A.1~z:a.Iv in o.s.No.29;’2c-m
Sd/1-g__
Fudge
mph!-*
I-~