IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.6409 of 2010
SANDEEP KUMAR MARIK @ SANJEEV MARIK
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
4 16.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
A dead body was recovered and informed
by the Chowkidar to the concerned Police
Station. In course of investigation, one
Tripurari Rajak working at the deceased’s shop
disclosed that in the evening of 14.11.2007 he
along with the deceased went to temple where
this petitioner along with one unknown person
met his master, there was some talk and he was
informed that they will come back after a feast
but did not come back. This much was informed to
the family members, they came in search of the
deceased, came to the Police Station and found
the dead body of informant’s brother.
The submission of learned counsel for
the petitioner is that there was no enmity in
between the petitioner and the deceased nor the
petitioner has any criminal antecedent and the
matter was not informed to any authority
including Police Station by family members of
the deceased even after knowing his
disappearance on the next day but that is
2
sufficiently explained. The dead body is
recovered on 16.11.2007. Post mortem report goes
to show about the death in between 24-74 hours
that includes the night of disappearance. The
matter is under investigation so, the petitioner
is not entitled for anticipatory bail.
Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on
behalf of petitioner is rejected.
AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)