High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sandeep vs State Of Haryana on 17 December, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sandeep vs State Of Haryana on 17 December, 2009
Crl. Misc No. M-26937 of 2009                                             1


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                               Crl. Misc No. M-26937 of 2009
                               Date of decision : 17.12.2009

Sandeep
                                                         ....Petitioner

                                      V/s

State of Haryana
                                                         ....Respondent

BEFORE : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Dhir, AAG Haryana.

RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)

This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail to the petitioner in a case registered

vide FIR No. 5 dated 06.01.2009 under Sections 307/353/186/34 IPC & 25

of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar, Panipat.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in the

alleged occurrence, no police official was injured. Learned counsel submits

that petitioner has been in custody since 06.01.2009 and some prosecution

witnesses have already been deposed before the trial court. He further

submits that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail as trial is likely to

take quite some time to conclude.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for grant

of bail on the ground that allegations against the petitioner are serious in

nature. He, however does not dispute the fact that 4 prosecution witnesses
Crl. Misc No. M-26937 of 2009 2

have already been deposed before the trial court and trial may still take

some time to conclude.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case at this

stage and taking into consideration the period of detention already suffered

by him and the fact that trial may take some time to conclude, I deem it

appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the petition

is allowed and he is ordered to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of

Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate Panipat.

17.12.2009                                        (RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay                                                  JUDGE