IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 25906 of 2010(K)
1. SANGEETHA D., W/O.B.RAJESH, AGED 35
... Petitioner
2. ANILA P.M., W/O.P.J.ROOPAK,
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
4. THE MANAGER, S.D.P.Y.SCHOOLS,
5. THE HEADMASTER, S.D.P.Y.GIRLS
6. THE HEADMASTER, S.D.P.Y. BOYS HIGH
7. SMT.NISHA ARAVIND, UPSA,
8. SMT.SANDHYA K.V., UPSA,
9. SMT.SINDHU G.NAIR,
10. SMT.JIJI,
11. SMT.SANTHA C.V., TEACHER,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Dated :17/08/2010
O R D E R
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P. (C) No. 25906 OF 2010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 17th day of August, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners were appointed as Upper Primary
School Assistants respectively, in SDPY, GVHSS, Palluruthy
and SDPY, BHS, Palluruthy, belonging to the 4th respondent.
The respondents 7 to 11 were appointed under the schools
belonging to the 4th respondent as Lower Primary School
Assistants. The grievance of the petitioner is that in
anticipation of reduction of posts in the category of LPSA
steps are already initiated to shift the petitioners to the
category of LPSA to avoid a possible retrenchment of
respondents 7 to 11. According to the petitioners such
shifting of posts is impermissible in law. But, they are not
allowed to mark their attendance as UPSA based on such
proposal, it is submitted. In the said circumstances, they
have preferred Exts.P9 and P10 before the 3rd respondent and
they are pending before the 3rd respondent.
2. Considering the fact that the petitioner have already
taken up their grievances before the 3rd respondent as per
WPC.No.25906/2010
: 2 :
Exts.P9 and P10 and that they are pending before the 3rd
respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to
the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P9 and
P10 expeditiously, at any rate within a period of six weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice
to the petitioners, 4th Respondent and to respondents 7 to 11.
Sd/-
(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)
jma
//true copy//
P.A to Judge