High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sanjay Tiwari vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sanjay Tiwari vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.898 of 2011
                      SANJAY TIWARI, SON OF LATE GULAB TIWARY
                                           Versus
                                THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated

13.4.2010 but stating therein that it was being rejected for the

present.

Considering that the co-accused Pappu Mishra

whose prayer for bail was also rejected by the same order has

been granted bail by this Court by an order dated 21.12.2010

passed in Cr. Misc. 41259 of 2010, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Sri Awadhesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Begusarai, in Barauni (Refinery) P.S. Case No. 224 of

2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner and the other shall be the sister of the petitioner. The

bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about

any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature
2

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give

an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he

fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali