Allahabad High Court High Court

Sanjeev Dixit & Others vs State Of U.P. on 5 August, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Sanjeev Dixit & Others vs State Of U.P. on 5 August, 2010
Court No. - 46

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374 CR.P.C. No. - 3403 of 2010
Petitioner :- Sanjeev Dixit & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Ranjan Mishra,B.K. Shukla,G.S.
Chaturvedi
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,Jitendra Singh Lodhi
Connected with
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374 CR.P.C. No. - 3428 of 2010
Petitioner :- Shankar Singh & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- Jitendra Singh Lodhi
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,B.K.Shukla,N.I.Jafri

Hon'ble Amar Saran,J.

Hon’ble Shri Kant Tripathi,J.

Since both the aforesaid appeals arise out of one incident, the bail 
applications filed in the aforesaid cross appeals are being consolidated 
and disposed of by a common order.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the learned A.G.A. and 
perused the judgment and order.

In the appeal preferred by Sanjeev Dixit and others, two persons have 
been   shown   dead   for   which   Sanjeev   Dixit   and   others   are   facing 
prosecution. In the appeal of Shankar Singh and others one person is 
shown to have died in which Shankar Singh and others  are being 
prosecuted.   The   occurrence   has   occurred   on   the   same   date   at   the 
house   of   Sanjeev   Dixit.   There   are   declaration   of   injuries   on   both 
sides. It cannot be determined as to which side was aggressor. 
Keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances of the case and 
submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned 
AGA,   the   appellants   Sanjeev   Dixit,   Arvind   and   Shesh   Narain 
involved in the session trial no. 161/1997 arising out of case crime no. 
354A of 1997, police station Kotwali Orai, district Jalaun and the 
appellants Shankar Singh, Malik alias Mangal Singh and Sheo Kumar 
involved   in   S.T.   No.   160/1997   arising   out   of   crime   no.354/1997, 
police station Kotwali Orai, district Jalaun are released on bail during 
the pendency of the appeal, on their each furnishing a personal bond 
and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the 
court concerned.

The realisation of half of the fine shall remain stayed during pendency 
of the appeal, provided the appellants deposit half of the fine within 
one month.

On acceptance of bail bonds and personal bonds, the lower court shall 
transmit photo state copies thereof to this Court for being kept on the 
record of the concerned appeal.

List the appeals for final hearing in due course.
Order Date :- 5.8.2010
RKSh