Posted On by &filed under High Court, Karnataka High Court.


Karnataka High Court
Sanjeev Reddy S/O Basavarajappa … vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 January, 2010
Author: V.Gopalagowda And A.S.Bopanna
IN TIIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ESANGALORE=,dI'~~.V'

DATED "1'HISTIwII£ 2:-am DAY OF JANUARY, 2r:€.I6" "' 

PRES ENT

'11-Ira: HON'BI.}?3 MR. JUSTICE v.G1OPINA?COWbA    'I

AND? 

"rm: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE

WRIT PETITION N§:225..:I/2.0 i'e1eM>MM-S)

BFIIWEEN:
SANJEEV REDDY   j'--  g 
S/O BASAvARAJAPpA--.,(;QU:)_A PA7I'II;. _
AGEDA.BO1J'I'i3OYEAR'5»    
OCC:CI,ASS I CZON'I'RACTI'C1R.

R/O DARSHAN/'.P--UR.'*«.   
PO UKKENAL 1:9,, SHAHV.,PUR. , '
DIST. YADGIR '  '

A L' V _ .  PE'I'ITIONER
[By Sr}:  I
AND: .  I I I 
Q I "v'1'r»;1:'I§I'A?!"E c5'p:';gARN2I*fAKA
~ RE1*'--I'_I) £3Y'ITIS4VS'I3CRE'I'ARY

 pE:PAR<:'a\km;N  CF MINES & GEOLOGY.
zv:.s;-5:,z11;aI1_4.Q. 5ANGALOREw ;1

'  '1'I~1E;Ex£2c;'L1':'I*§f:~; ENGINEER

 ". MINOR IRI*7i1GA'I'ION DIVISICDN.
' V . __ G  I.,E3ARC7:.f{ . . . RESP(".)NDICI'€'I'S

  "~.I_By_»:sf-'1_: §2.(;.Ko1,1..€_ AGA}

 W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE

CV:C'I'\'IS'I7'IT'U'I'IC)I\I OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPOND?:II\I'I':3

 I)§--NQT'»'1'c) DIEDUCT ROYALTY FROM THI:? £311.15 OF' THE H-",'1'*1'I'IoNER
 VAVNEB ~N0'1" TO INSIST THIS PE'I'I'I']O§\EER TO PR()DUC}33 '1'r~u«: ROYALTY

\/



PAID RECIIEIIYIS BY THIER VENDORS ('Si DIRECT Tlilfil RESP()NDE',N'l'S

TO REl'*'UE\iE) Tl--IE ROYAI.-TY ALREADY DEE)UC'I'ED FRO§Vi TI-IE BILLS OF
TH E PE'I'l'l'l()N ER.

'l'hi..s peiition coming on for orders this day. Gopaleiifixjcaii/icia

J.. made the following:

ORDER

Learned Additional Government. :’AdV:’oc.ate’iiaccepts hence

for the respondents and he is’l._15ermitt’e<:l to l'fileV§._'me.mio ofw."

appearance within izwo weeks from..1:o'day'…_V

2. En Writ. vAppeaV1_’l’ similar legal

contentions have 3:_5ee:j….i-;,1rge.d arid follVowin.g..»ihe decision of the

Horrble Sulppreme .C’oiirtktlieii.writ’appeal was disposed of vide
order ll stating that the writ.

pei:.it.ioi1_erjrespondlelnt.ygfho is the purchaser of the minor

mi-:_1eral’s…Vl’r’o_vrri.liisvvendor to produce documents to evidence

fact. l;ii:«,1t or the licensee has paid the royalty to

V”~.._t_he_I)epar:.ii:icI1t. The respondent -purchaser who is the writ

is not liable to pay the royalty to the Department in

it reslpeci. of the minor mineral purchased by him.

\\_/

3. in terms of the said order, this writ petition is

disposed o’fwii:l”1 liberty to the petiiierier to p1’0d1.ie..e_i’-.gi=:)()f

before the 0ff’i(:e1″s of the Department not to irisistfrir .

of royalty again in respect of the minerals whieh’ itlsed in ii”

the civil works by the petitioner, as rdy21I–iy*~ivs 2};}re’a_g1yA’r,.éiidV{‘i.ri

respect of such minerals. V V

S*/Ck


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.111 seconds.