High Court Kerala High Court

Santhosh vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 30 May, 2007

Kerala High Court
Santhosh vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 30 May, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3156 of 2007()


1. SANTHOSH, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SANKARAN,
3. LEELA, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O SANKARAN,

                        Vs



1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.JEENA JOSEPH

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :30/05/2007

 O R D E R
                               V. RAMKUMAR, J.


                   ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

                            B.A. No. 3156 OF 2007

                   ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

                   Dated this the 30th day of May, 2007


                                     O R D E R

Petitioner, 3 in number, seek anticipatory bail on the

allegation that the Vadakkanchery police are at their heels in

connection with Crime No.196/07 registered for offences

punishable under sections 498A and 306 read with section 34 IPC.

2. Petitioners are the brother-in-law, father-in-law and

mother-in-law respectively of Anupama, who committed suicide on

16.5.07. The marriage between Anupama and Rajeev, son of the

petitioners 2 and 3, was on 28.1.07.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted

that the petitioners 1 and 2 are not accused in the crime and that

the 3rd petitioner, who was the mother-in-law, is the 2nd accused

and Rajeev is the first accused. If so, the apprehension of arrest

and harassment entertained by the petitioners 1 and 2 is

unfounded. With regard to the 3rd petitioner with whom the

deceased bride was residing after the marriage, it is too early to

accept her contention that she has been falsely implicated in the

case. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature.

BA.3156/07

: 2 :

There is no reason why she should not surrender before the

Magistrate having jurisdiction and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if

the 3rd petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and

files an application for regular bail, within two weeks from today,

the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the

same date on which it is filed.

This application is disposed of as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks