Santhosh vs The Excise Inspector on 5 April, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2028 of 2010()


1. SANTHOSH, S/O.SOMASEKHARAN PILLAI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :05/04/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                    ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 2028 of 2010
                  --------------------------------
               Dated this the 5th day of April, 2010

                            O R D E R

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in

Crime No.13/2010 of Kazhakoottam Excise Range.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 8(1)(2) of the Abkari Act.

3. The prosecution case is that on 15/3/2010, the

petitioner was found in possession of 3 litres of arrack. The

petitioner was arrested on 15/3/2010 and he was remanded to

judicial custody.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone by the

petitioner, the nature of the offence and the present stage of

investigation, I am of the view that bail can be granted to the

petitioner.

5. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing

bond for Rs.15,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First

B.A. No. 2028 /2010
2

Class-I, Attingal subject to the following conditions:-

A) The petitioner shall report before the
Investigating Officer between 9 A.M. and
11 A.M. on all Mondays, till the final report
is filed or until further orders.

B) The petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer for interrogation as
and when required.

C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence
or indulge in any prejudicial activity while
on bail.

E) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable
to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed as above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm