High Court Kerala High Court

Santhosh vs The State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2008

Kerala High Court
Santhosh vs The State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2151 of 2008()


1. SANTHOSH, S/O NARAYANAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SATHYAN, S/O NARAYANAN,
3. SUMATHI, W/O NARAYANAN,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JIJO PAUL

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :07/04/2008

 O R D E R
                           R. BASANT, J.
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                    B.A.No. 2151 of 2008
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008

                              O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are the

husband of the defacto complainant and his relatives. The

marriage took place in 27.5.2007. Not even an year has passed

and the parties are before courts now. The petitioners face

allegations of matrimonial cruelty punishable under Section

498A I.P.C. Crime has been registered on the basis of a private

complaint filed by the defacto complainant before the learned

Magistrate and referred to the police under Section 156(3)

Cr.P.C. Investigation is in progress. The petitioners apprehend

imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays, the

learned Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I am

satisfied, in the facts and circumstances of this case, that

anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners, subject to

appropriate terms and conditions. The admitted fact that the

B.A.No. 2151 of 2008
2

victim has not suffered any physical injury and the reality that arrest

and incarceration of the petitioners is likely to mar all possibilities of

harmonious reconciliation of marital relationship do weigh with me to

grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

3. In the result:

(1) This application is allowed.

(2) The following directions are issued under Section 438

Cr.P.C.

(a) The petitioners shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

on 15.4.2008 at 11 a.m. The learned Magistrate shall release the

petitioners on regular bail on condition that they execute bonds

for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two

solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned

Magistrate.

(b) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m. and 3

p.m. on 16.4.08 and 17.4.2008 and thereafter between 10 and 12 noon

on all Mondays and Fridays for a period of two months and

B.A.No. 2151 of 2008
3

subsequently as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in

writing to do so.

(c) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned Magistrate

as directed in clause (1) above, these directions shall lapse on

15.4.2008 and the police shall be at liberty thereafter to arrest the

petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law.

(d) If the petitioners were arrested prior to their surrender on

15.4.2008 as directed in clause (1) above, they shall be released on

bail on their executing bonds for Rs.25,000/- each without any surety

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on 15.4.2008.

(R. BASANT)
Judge

tm