IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.27547 of 2010
BECHAN YADAV, SON OF LATE BECHALAL YADAV
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
with
Cr.Misc. No.20572 of 2010
SANTOSH MEHTA @ BOUA MEHTA, SON OF LATE BALRAM
MEHTA
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the
offence under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Considering that the eye witness account came one
year after the occurrence and before that only speculation has
been raised against the petitioners, let the petitioners above
named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge,
F.T.C. IInd, Supaul, in Sessions Trial No. 187 of 2010 arising
out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008 (Cr. Misc. 27547 of
2010) and Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, in Birpur
P.S. Case No. 105 of 2008 (Cr. Misc. 20572 of 2010) subject to
the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close
relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving
genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the
other shall be the father/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will
2
undertake to furnish information to the court about any change
in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state
on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the
petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature
after their release in the present case and thereafter the court
below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation
of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be
well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two
consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali