Gujarat High Court High Court

Sarabhai vs Acid on 20 December, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Sarabhai vs Acid on 20 December, 2010
Author: Y.R.Meena,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

FA/354/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

FIRST
APPEAL No.354 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No.1107 of 2008
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL No.354 of 2008
 

======================================
 

SARABHAI
M CHEMICALS THE CHAIRMAN - Appellant
 

Versus
 

ACID
SALES CORPORATION NARAYANBHAI GOPALDAS PATEL - Defendants
 

====================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR SP MAJMUDAR for Appellant(s)
: 1, 
MR HARNISH V DARJI for Defendant(s) :
1, 
======================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			THE CHIEF JUSTICE Y. R. MEENA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM N. MEHTA
		
	

 

Date
: 18/03/2008 

 

ORAL
ORDER

At
the outset, Mr.Bharda, learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff
submits that money suit was filed in the trial Court for recovery of
Rs.29,53,259=00. That suit was decreed.

Counsel
for the respondent-plaintiff further submits that though the issue is
regarding outstanding amount and the amount to be paid to the
plaintiff-respondent was ordered by the trial Court, but in one-line
the trial Court mentioned in the impugned order that the suit was
barred by law of limitation. Therefore, to avoid this anomaly, the
impugned decree and order can be set aside and the matter be remitted
back to the trial Court to decide the suit on merits including the
issue regarding limitation.

Learned
counsel for the appellant Mr.Majmudar has no objection if this prayer
is acceded to and the matter be sent back to the trial Court.

Considering
the joint prayer, we set aside the impugned decree and order and
remit the matter back to the trial Court to give fresh opportunity to
both the sides to lead evidence and take a fresh decision by giving
reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Consequently,
the appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Notice
is discharged.

Civil
Application also stands disposed of.

(Y.

R. MEENA, C. J.)

(BANKIM
N. MEHTA, J.)

Rajendra

   

Top