IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2277 of 2011
Sarpnath Singh ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD
For the Petitioner : M/s A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate, Lina Shakti
For the State : A.P.P.
03/24.06.2011
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel
appearing for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section
147/148/149/341/342/323/364/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of
the C.L.A. Act.
Learning counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that two persons
namely, Sudhir Singh and Lalan Singh when were killed by members of MCC, a
case was registered against the petitioner also, but name of the petitioner has come
only on the basis of suspicion by saying that the petitioner and others, by hiring the
members of MCC, got killed the deceased, but that allegation is based on suspicion
and that suspicion has been made for the reason that the petitioner had fought
election of Gram Pradhan against Lalan Singh and the petitioner got defeated, but
there has been absolutely no evidence that this petitioner had hired the killer and
under this situation, the petitioner deserves to be admitted on bail.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner,
above named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/ (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with
Panki P.S. Case No. 54 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. No. 1015 of 2006.
(R. R. Prasad, J.)
Manish