High Court Kerala High Court

Sathar vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 14 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sathar vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 14 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27682 of 2009(E)


1. SATHAR, AGED 30 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. N.K.ABU (PATTA ABU),

5. ALIYAR, S/O.KUNJEEN PILLA,

6. RAHEEM, S/O.ALIYAR,

7. ALI, S/O.PAREEKKUTTY,

8. SHAMEER, S/O.SAIDU,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY

                For Respondent  :SRI.C.A.NAVAS

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :14/10/2009

 O R D E R
             KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JJ
              ------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C). No.27682 of 2009
                   --------------------------------
            Dated this the 14th day of October,2009

                            JUDGMENT

Kurian Joseph.J

The petitioner approached this court with the following

prayer.

“a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order

or direction, commanding the respondents 1 to 3 to give and provide

adequate and meaningful police protection for the life of the petitioner

and his family and also for the property covered by Ext.P1 to P4

documents”

2. In view of the possibility for breach of peace, on

1/10/2009 we directed the police to ensure that law and order is

maintained. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

thereafter there is no law and order problem and there is no

disturbances to the petitioner. The learned counsel for

respondents 4 to 8 submits that in respect of the activities of

the petitioner and people whom the petitioner has permitted to

reside at the premises there are various complaints and the

authority competent to look into those complaints have not

W.P.(C). No.27682 of 2009

2

taken any prompt steps/action in the matter.We make it clear

the judgment shall not stand in the way of the authority

concerned taking any appropriate action in accordance with the

law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE
ssn