High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Satish @ Pilot vs State on 14 January, 2009

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Satish @ Pilot vs State on 14 January, 2009
                                                                                     1

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
  --------------------------------------------------------


                                CIVIL WRIT No. 7343 of 2008

                                               SATISH @ PILOT
                                               V/S
                                                     STATE

    Mr. KR BHATI, for the appellant / petitioner

    Mr. JPS CHOUDHARY, PP, for the respondent

    Date of Order : 14.1.2009

                                 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.
                                 HON'BLE SHRI C M TOTLA,J.

                                             ORDER

—–

Heard learned counsel for either side.

The petitioner’s prayer for shifting to open air

camp jail has been dismissed by the impugned order dated

12.6.2008 only on the ground that the prisoner is permanent

resident of Punjab.

It is contended by the petitioner that the

petitioner is a resident of Ganganagar District in

Rajasthan, he has already enjoyed parole for about 10

times, and is in custody for last 11 years.

A rejoinder has been filed by the prisoner

supported by the affidavit of his cousin brother, annexing

therewith a copy of transfer certificate from the

headmaster, Vikas Public School, Ladhuwala, District

Sriganganagar, showing that the prisoner was admitted in

the school as Class-IV passed candidate on 10.7.1987, and

had left the school on 14.5.1988 for seeking education at
2

other place. Likewise, a certificate from the Sarpanch of

Gram Panchayat 15 SPM, Tehsil Sadulshahar has also been

produced, certifying that the family of the prisoner is

living in Chak 17 SPM (Godhuwali), Tehsil Sadulshahar,

District Sriganganagar for last 26-27 years. These

documents have not been controverted on the side of the

respondents, and it is also not shown that despite the

family living in Rajasthan for last 26-27 years i.e.

practically since the birth of the prisoner, or even a bit

earlier, the petitioner would be continued to be treated to

be a permanent resident of Punjab only.

In view of the above, we do not find the order

refusing to shift the petitioner in open air camp jail to

be sustainable. The same is, therefore, quashed, and the

concerned authorities are directed to expeditiously re-

examine the matter on merits, about the petitioner’s

entitlement to be shifted in open air camp jail, treating

him to be resident of Rajasthan. It is clarified that in

consideration of the petitioner’s case on merits, about

transfer to open air camp jail, the rejection order will

not be taken into consideration.

  ( C M TOTLA ),J.                                            ( N P GUPTA ),J.


/tarun/