IN THE HIGH COURT op KARNATAI<xL u
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 13% DAY ()1? AUGUST? 2 2
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR.J_US'I'ICE R.B.NAli{. X e
CRIMINAL PETI'TI(V)1V$--.eaI:$¥o.712"4'z2 O{)8; s
Between .. V 1 .
Satish S/0 Shivappa * V
Aged: 25 years, O.c<::,VStud-entg, , -
R/0 o y 2
Byadgi Taluk, Havezii 'i3ist1ic£;
_ _* ..Petitioner
(By Sri.S.N}.Nav:aiag1:ne:do4.& C.Banakar, Advocate)
And _V V _ V
The ....
'Kagi'neIe* "Felix Complainant
= Benc11.,'*A1:.f)ha1Wad.
By._Sfat'o. ePu1)Iie_P1fosecutor,
High (39:11-tvvI3'oi1di3:1g;'
. Respondent.
‘:{;I§33?VV§-*3:7i.Vl?f.}{z.(‘}otl<}1indi, HCGP)
. A Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of
praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime
. _ of Mudalg Police Station.
venlade the following:
This petition coming on for orders this day the Court
5§Qs>m.o;,:JrL_.
Q_13.1?.lE..3iE , >
A case in Cr.No.3/2008 1,751–.-.2GCf«8
for ofienoes punishable unde1’TVf.§eetioiis ‘V1143,
324, 307, 302, 504 age 5o6,L},I.w’we,,_;4§o gggainst the
petitioner and ten as A– 1.
The coseaplafmanf: one the deceased.
tie is an -eto in question. He
in his :i}I.§:._f:.I.Vs there was a quarrel
between the one hand and himself
and his regard to the shed which was
“‘p1;t front of house. All the petitioners were
‘shed should be removed, at their instance,
the.eI_;ied However few poles were yet to be
..,%.j,T’_;’:..«._fe:moved; That on 16-1-2008 at about 8 p.m. the
‘ returned to his house afier attending to the
. operations in his land. He had dinner and to
ibuy betel nuts he was going to the nearby shop. When. he
was so going, petitioner/accused. herein along with Mahesh
K 6; ex
3
Basanthappa Kammar, Shekharappa, –f ”
Danappannavar, A-3 Shivappa, A-4
house and started removing the of” j
They abused the complainant
foul and filthy language. theih»
and lit fire to them, eemplainant
Shivappa and the the said accused
persons apesre . Despite the
same, the clubs iying at the said
place and with a club in
his of Shivappa causing him a
bleediI1g.. picked up another club
the complainant tried to intervene
Accused Shekappa fisted on the
V faceAo.:f_; accused Lingaraju with a club assaulted
‘ ” the of the complainant. Accused Kumar with a
assaulted on the forehead of the complainant.
Cmziplainant and injmed Shivappa started Wailing out. The
“complainant brether’s son Anand came to their rescue.
is,,&m
Accused Shekappa with a club assaulted his
head. Prakash and Lingaraj also assamted’mfi§jgd”{vith
hands. One Chennabasappa Viv..a.§1¢fiso ‘:
assaulted by Manjappa wit11V__ea~ .$P’io1t1d-ef.
Shekappa assaulted rod on the
right knee. Yashoda, the complainant
intervened. assaulted her.
club. The villagers
att1’acte:i”‘b§} :i¢;:_; came to the scene of
occmrehee. went away from the scene
of ” has occurred at about 10-30
” ‘I 1″-accused persons who are alleged to have
not only Shivappa Basappa, but
The complainant has not explained as to
V-how 1 could identify these petitioner/aocaxsed alone
on the head of the deceased Shivappa and
etiributed a specific overt act to petitioner A-1. A-2 Mahesh
‘ who is claimed to have assaulted with a club on the person
of Shivappa and A«-3 Shekappa who is claimed to have fisted,
.R,QL£_J\{E;,;3’~—-««
prosecution or witnesses for prosecution.
shall regularly attend the trial Coutft.
‘ . 1:, £%%; f & W
-%:% Iudge %”
Sbb/«