High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Satya Narain Singh @ Tanik Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Satya Narain Singh @ Tanik Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.22525 of 2010
           SATYA NARAIN SINGH @ TANIK SINGH, SON OF LATE CHOUBA
           SINGH
                                           Versus
                                 THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 12.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 25(1-B)A, 27 of the Arms Act and

Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that even though there is an

allegation that there was firing but no one was injured and from

the possession of the petitioner, allegedly Fire Arms were

recovered which were handed over to the Informant.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who

is in custody since 14.12.2008, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. –

IV, Nawada, in Sessions Trial No. 29 of 2009 arising out of

Muffasil P.S. Case No. 126 of 2008 subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the court about any change in address of

the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that

he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated
2

in any other case of similar nature after his release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to

initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of

misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

The fact that the petitioner is an accused in only one

other case besides the present one will be verified by the

Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali