IN THE HIGHMCOURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25:11 DAY OF H BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE,v'VIVJ'A!3AN2'JZXTHAN7~'h M.F.A.No.S260/2007 . I A ' BETWEEN: SATYAPPA S /0 BHEERAPPA MADD1, _ AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 'A , OCC:HAMALI (COOLIE) (Now''N_1L},'_ ; R/O SALAI-IALL1, TALUK 1;:A'M'Dv1§R_GA'A»._, mST:13ELGAuM.:' _ APPELLANT (By Sri.San}a$i_S;:i§§'gfié1,c§eri.,:"25§::i'A,.)'A-' AND , ' , 1. SR1.MA~NOHAR RAMACHANDRA KALAKUNDRIKAR AGED ABOUT. 40 YEARS, Q§:(:;B.USINES_,S, ~ v.:R/~O;,_2,00.,_/6, RAD'?-EAKRISHNA MARG, ,' =_HINDWADL D£S'l':BE'.LGAUM. 2. bI\}A1'S1'bNAL MANAGER, THE,._N1a:A.x;"'1ND1A ASSURANCE Co, LTD., CLUBROAD, BELGAUM. RESPONDENTS
E Sfi,’N§.K.S0udagar, Adv. for R2,
“med;
E ” This appeal is med 11/3 173 (1) of MV Act against the
Ix.)
judgment and award dated 19.09.2006 passed in MVC
No.238-4/2003 on the file of H1 Additional Civil Judge, Sr’.l3n. 82;
Additional MACT, Belgaum, partly allowing the clairnl,pe.titi.on
for compensation and seeking enhancement of comp¢e_n’sation.i’~ V
This appeal coming on for further orders,’l’t’riisjd.ajk,ltthe
court delivered the following:
Jvoemafirli
Heard the learned cotzriseh for the part_ies.:’ii.inally in-_”
respect of the appeal preferret-la by lclairrlant for
enhancement of compensation.’
2. Sri.Sanjay the appellant
submits that__ _Vtal<eni'lesselrl income and lower
percentage of awarding amount towards future
loss of earnj_ng_and_itha–t l_n–o_i"a;'ri1ount has been given towards
loss of; amenities of' 'l'ifei.l" this regard, appellant's counsel
.referre'ditol'ithe' evidencemon record and to that of the doctor who
certificate.
.3. iiOn t’ne’other hand, Sri.Soudagar, learned counsel for the
all’.””I3ft:SL1I’8,l’1CéHi Company submitted that the quantum of
__&tcoinpensation requires no enhancement under any of the
“riii i tdheads. wig”
Ln)
4. Taking note of the evidence on record, income could have
been taken at 1333.100/H» and disability at E5% to the xv%_1e1e'<–hG–dy
and consequently towards loss of future €aI"I1i1'1gS_,'\:'1I"1'1dL1fii;'u\fX}iii, =
new work out to Rs.97,200/– as against»_Rs.2_–9.;50'Gi[f':»~. given' by ii
the Tribunal. Therefore, under this, he-_jad,i the
increased by Rs.67,'700/–~. Todfaaids less 'oftarnienritiesmni" liifead
Rs.15,000/~ is awarded and cdtiapensafiion gets
enhanced by Rs.82,'700/ «':1I;V:'I2(3i.1.ii'~1_'V["v."\.xtir*i'1]"'CEiI"I'y interest at
6% pa. The appeaiis thus..a.l.iowed.
Jm/~