IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.4379 of 2011
SATYENDRA DUSADH
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
02 11.02.2011 The petitioner is in custody in relation to Sone Nagar
Rail P.S. Case No.12/1989 instituted under Section-395 of IPC for
abuse of privilege of bail.
As is apparent, the case was instituted in 1989. The
petitioner was released on bail in 1990 by orders of this Court but
thereafter absconded as such in 1993 his bail and bail bond was
cancelled. Ultimately, in 2008 when distress warrants and attachment
warrants were executed he surrendered and is in custody since then.
On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the
petitioner is a truck driver and had no information with regard to
commitment of the case. This is not acceptable. The order clearly
shows that his Lawyer was duly informed but still he did not choose
not to appear. In T.I. parade he was identified by the informant.
Be that as it may, as the petitioner is in custody since
2008, let a report be called from the trial Court as to the time that
would take to conclude the trial. The report must reach this Court
within two weeks.
Put up this case immediately thereafter.
Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)