Gujarat High Court High Court

Saurashtra vs Vashram on 3 May, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Saurashtra vs Vashram on 3 May, 2011
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/3384/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR ORDERS No. 3384 of 2011
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12522 of 2002
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SAURASHTRA
CHEMICALS LIMITED - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

VASHRAM
BHURA & 4 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
NANAVATI
ASSOCIATES for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR ASHISH H SHAH for Respondent(s) : 1 - 3. 
MR
PS GOGIA for Respondent(s) : 4, 
None for Respondent(s) :
5, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 03/05/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned Advocate Mr. Joshi for Nanavti Associates for applicant,
learned Advocate Mr. Mr. Nair appearing for Mr. Ashish H.
Shah,learned advocate for opponents No. 1 to 3, learned Advocate Mr.
PS Gogia for opponent NO.4 Contractor.

This
application is preferred by Saurashtra Chemicals Limited original
petitioner-present applicant with a prayer to modify order of this
Court dated 23.2.2011 by extending time for a further period of two
weeks to place on record details of heirs and legal representatives
of opponent no.5 by joining them as parties to main petition.

Considering
submissions made by both learned advocates and also considering
avermetns made in this application, order passed by this Court dated
23.2.2011 is modified to the effect that time to bring on record
heirs and legal representatives of respondent NO.5 in Special Civil
Application No. 12522 of 2002 is further extended for a period of
one month. Let within that period, this objection is to be removed
failing which matter will stand dismissed in default without
reference to this Court.

With
these observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

(H.K.

Rathod,J.)

Vyas

   

Top