Loading...

Scheduled Caste Development … vs The Director on 13 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Scheduled Caste Development … vs The Director on 13 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37089 of 2010(I)


1. SCHEDULED CASTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GR.I
                      ...  Petitioner
2. PRASANNAN.R.,
3. ASUMA BEEVI.A,
4. SARATHCHANDRIKA DEVI.P.S.

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULED CASTE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

3. THE DEPARTMENT PROMOTION COMMITTEE

                For Petitioner  :SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/12/2010

 O R D E R
                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
                     ==================
                      W.P.(C).No.37089 of 2010
                     ==================
              Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010
                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are Junior Superintendents in the Department of

Scheduled Caste Development of the Government of Kerala. They

aspire for promotion to the post of Senior Superintendents. But a new

qualification has been introduced by way of two years of experience.

According to the petitioners, when a new qualification has been

prescribed, the incumbents should have been given an opportunity to

acquire that qualification and they should have been considered for

promotion in accordance with the seniority subject to acquiring that

new qualification. Seeking this relief, the 1st petitioner has filed Exts.P9

and P10 representations before the 2nd respondent. The petitioners

seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on

Exts.P9 and P10, expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with

a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on

Exts.P9 and P10 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the

petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three

months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

sdk+                                                S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
          ///True copy///


                             P.A. to Judge

2

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information