Sebastian Chokkattu vs The District Collector on 13 November, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 25829 of 2008(Y)


1. SEBASTIAN CHOKKATTU, 1A,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY)

3. THE KERALA STATE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :13/11/2008

 O R D E R
                            K.M. JOSEPH, J.

              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                   W.P.(C) No. 25829 OF 2008 Y
              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
            Dated this the 13th day of November, 2008

                            J U D G M E N T

Heard learned counsel for petitioner Sri.M.P.Ashok

Kumar, learned senior counsel on behalf of the 3rd respondent

Sri.Pathrose Mathai and learned Government Pleader Sri.Bejoy

Chandran.

I notice that there is an arbitration clause in Ext.R3(a).

I feel that in the teeth of this clause this writ petition need not be

entertained. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of without

prejudice to the remedies available to the petitioner.

Sd/-

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks

// TRUE COPY //

P.A. TO JUDGE